Fingerprint graphicFingerprint graphic

Integration of Social Assistance and Security Programs in an Adaptive Social Protection Framework

October 9th 2024

Article BlogAdaptive Social Protection (ASP)

Integration of Social Assistance and Security Programs in an Adaptive Social Protection Framework

Written By: Eri Krismiyaningsih Summary of the Article from Salus Cultura Journal, Kemenko PMK June 2024 Edition

The social protection system is crucial in supporting and maintaining household capacity to prepare for, cope with, and adapt to shocks through social assistance schemes, social insurance, and labor market programs [1]. In Indonesia, social assistance and social insurance programs have significantly contributed to poverty reduction efforts and in protecting citizens from various risks throughout their life cycle [2]. The Ministry of Social Affairs offers various forms of social assistance, such as cash transfers, basic food aid, building materials, death benefits, and livelihood recovery assistance [3]. Meanwhile, Indonesia’s social insurance schemes consist of five programs: National Health Insurance (JKN), Work Accident Insurance (JKK), Death Insurance (JKM), Old-Age Savings (JHT), and Pension Insurance (JP), all regulated under Law No. 40/2004 on the National Social Security System (SJSN). Recently, Indonesia introduced the Job Loss Insurance (JKP) scheme, originally intended to support workers who lost their jobs due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, the implementation of social assistance and insurance programs often faces challenges due to issues such as mistargeting of beneficiaries, uncoordinated program execution, funding limitations, and a lack of integrated data systems [4,5]. Social assistance and insurance coverage for the poor remains inadequate, especially in low-income countries. According to UNDP, only around 11% of the poorest population receives social protection programs [6]. In Indonesia, access to social insurance programs is also uneven, particularly among those working in the informal sector [7].

Countries with demographic changes and evolving labor markets, such as Indonesia, as well as high disaster and climate change risks, require a more adaptive social protection system. The Adaptive Social Protection (ASP) concept emphasizes the importance of investing in improving the resilience of poor and vulnerable households, particularly through social assistance and insurance schemes, so they can better prepare for, cope with, and adapt to various risks [1,8].

It is expected that implementing the ASP approach in social assistance and insurance programs will enhance their role in building household resilience to shocks, preventing them from falling deeper into poverty. This is especially important given the short-term impacts these risks have on poor households, such as asset loss, livelihood disruptions, income reduction, and other adverse effects that can undermine their long-term welfare. Poor and vulnerable groups have very limited capacity to recover before shocks occur, which can trap them in poverty or push them into even more extreme levels of poverty.

ASP offers a comprehensive approach to enhancing public protection by integrating social protection concepts with Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Climate Change Adaptation (CCA). ASP strengthens public protection through vertical and horizontal expansion. Vertical expansion involves adding new types of benefits to existing program beneficiaries, while horizontal expansion increases the number of beneficiaries. Benefits can be expanded through cash and food aid to meet food needs during shocks. Additionally, combining these programs with disaster preparedness training will better equip households to handle emergencies. Conversely, horizontal expansion focuses on increasing the number of beneficiaries by targeting vulnerable groups such as children, pregnant women, the elderly, and people with disabilities.

Vertical and horizontal expansion has already been incorporated into several existing social assistance and insurance programs in Indonesia. Social assistance programs such as PKH, BPNT/Sembako, Rice Food Assistance, and RST, as well as social insurance programs like JKN, JKK, JKM, JHT, and JP, serve as regular social protection programs. Adaptive programs such as Adaptive PKH, ATENSI, PENA, Livelihood Assistance, BLT Food Risk Mitigation, KSB, TAGANA, Social Warehouses, Fisherman Insurance, Farmer Insurance, and Livestock Insurance align with the ASP framework. Existing social assistance and insurance programs have the potential to be further expanded to become more adaptive by: a) strengthening the "one data" system, integrating, and expanding regular social assistance and insurance programs; b) expanding the implementation of ATENSI and PENA programs, which have shown positive outcomes; c) expanding the implementation of KSB, TAGANA, and Social Warehouse programs, which help improve disaster preparedness; and d) increasing access to social insurance programs across various livelihood sectors.

As part of RDI’s contribution to supporting adaptive social protection in Indonesia, our study on how Indonesia’s social assistance and insurance programs integrate with the ASP framework has been published in the Salus Cultura Journal, issued by Kemenko-PMK. This discussion can be further explored in the following article (article is available in Bahasa Indonesia): https://jurnal.kemenkopmk.go.id/index.php/saluscultura/article/view/180/62

To read article in Bahasa:  

Recent Post

Integrating Education into Net-Zero Strategies and Energy Justice Frameworks
Integrating Education into Net-Zero Strategies and Energy Justice Frameworks

As a strategic means to bridge the technical, social, and ethical dimensions of climate action, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), in collaboration with Resilience Development Initiative (RDI), Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), ISF Indonesia Net-Zero Network, hosted an international seminar titled “Crossing Borders for Climate Action: Energy Justice, Net-Zero, and the Role of Education.” The event was held on August 7, 2025, in the Auditorium of the Faculty of Social Sciences Education (FPIPS) UPI. This event was organised as an interdisciplinary forum to strengthen dialogue in addressing the global challenge of achieving a just net-zero. This forum brought together educators, researchers, and energy practitioners to explore how education serves as a catalyst for change in addressing the global climate crisis, while ensuring that efforts towards net-zero do not leave vulnerable groups behind.

The seminar opened with remarks by Dr Iwan Setiawan, Head of the Geography Study Program. Dr Hj. Fitri Rahmafitria, a representative of the Dean of FPIPS UPI, delivered the keynote welcome remark, highlighting the expectation to generate strategic insights and policy recommendations that ensure the energy transition is not only rapid but also equitable and sustainable for all.

Global and Local Strategies for Net-Zero and Energy Justice

Annisa Joviani Astari, Ph.D., from UPI, opens the discussion by addressing the challenges, opportunities, and global commitments regarding the pathways to net-zero. Achieving net-zero can be accomplished through various actions, including transitioning to a green economy, generating millions of new green jobs, strengthening climate capacity and resilience, and utilising nature-based solutions as a cost-effective and inclusive pathway for climate action. Climate change is a cross-border challenge that no single country can solve alone; therefore, multiple international collaborations are essential.

Equitable transitions to net-zero, as explained by Dr Adam Tyson from the University of Leeds, are essential due to the differing definitions of net-zero. Companies should be held accountable regarding their emissions in the supply chain, therefore applying the principles of disclosure, verification, and transparency. Current emissions accounting practices allow corporations to claim net-zero by relying on natural carbon sinks, which mask continued fossil fuel use and fail to halt global warming.

Dr Stanislaus Risadi Apresian, from Universitas Katolik Parahyangan (Unpar), emphasises that achieving the net-zero agenda might cause unintended negative impacts for vulnerable societies. Consequently, all projects should incorporate an inclusive approach and a clear grievance mechanism to mitigate risks. Dr Niken Prilandita offers insight into the existing climate-energy governance model in Indonesia, where the energy policy trajectory remains one that favours fossil fuels (coal) over renewable energy. 

Climate Governance towards Net-Zero Emissions in Indonesia. The accountability, transparency, and trustworthiness of the actors/institutions involved in energy policy-making remain crucial for maintaining order in the energy regime, enabling a rapid transition towards low-carbon energy.

To conclude the seminar, Professor Jon Lovett advises that education for renewable energy is essential in achieving the net-zero target and will help solve global problems. There is a proven causal link between greenhouse gas emissions, land use change, and the extremes of global climate change; therefore, incorporating this into a curriculum across all study levels that is internationally relevant may be beneficial. The event marked a significant step in mainstreaming principles of social justice and sustainability into every decision-making process related to climate and energy.


Date: 26 August 2025

Written by: Vidya Azzizi (Programme Specialist)


August 26th 2025

Follow our Social Media
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Details

Related Khubs

Adaptive Social Protection (ASP)

RDI Logo

The Resilience Development Initiative (RDI) is a preeminent think tank institution in Southeast Asia with a strong focus
on conducting studies related to resilience and sustainable development.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Stay connected with our latest work.

© 2025 Resilience Development Initiative. All Rights Reserved.